Ohio Rejects 94MW Crossroads Solar Project Amid Local Opposition

The Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) denied the 94MW Crossroads solar project, citing significant local opposition. Open Road's Craig Adair criticized the decision, stating it undermines Ohio's energy security and the permitting process. The board's ruling emphasized that local governmental opposition outweighed project benefits, contradicting Ohio Supreme Court precedents. Open Road is considering legal options for appeal, highlighting concerns over the state's energy future reliant on natural gas amidst rising electricity demands.

Published Mar 26, 2026

The Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) rejected the 94MW Crossroads solar project due to substantial local opposition. Open Road criticized the decision, stating it undermines the state’s energy security and permitting process.

AI-curated by Theia

OPSB cited that local governmental opposition outweighed project benefits, despite Ohio Supreme Court precedents stating such opposition should not be the sole determinative factor. Open Road is reviewing legal options for appeal.

The rejection raises concerns about Ohio's energy future, particularly as demand for electricity rises and reliance on natural gas increases. The state has seen similar denials of solar projects based on public interest criteria.