Article

In a recent session of the NSW Legislative Assembly, Premier Chris Minns reiterated the government's commitment to the establishment of the Great Koala National Park (GKNP), despite a setback when Labor parliamentarians voted against a motion that would have ensured its creation irrespective of a federal carbon credits scheme. This motion, proposed by Greens MP Sue Higginson, sought to solidify the government's legislative commitment to the park, which has garnered significant public support.

The state government has earmarked $80 million in the 2023-24 budget for the park's development; however, its full realization hinges on the successful registration of a carbon project aimed at minimizing native forest logging. This project is currently navigating the federal approval process, which will define how carbon credits are calculated for such initiatives.

According to modeling by the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation, if a logging moratorium remains in place, the GKNP could potentially generate $300 million in carbon credits over 15 years. Extending this model to state forests could yield as much as $1.5 billion.

During a heated debate, Premier Minns emphasized the necessity of delivering the GKNP, stating, “We have to deliver it.” His comments came amidst scrutiny regarding the complexities of a potential carbon trading scheme, which could involve major emitters in NSW seeking to offset their emissions through the purchase of carbon credits.

Critics, including Nationals leader Dugald Saunders, have accused the government of creating a “phantom project,” arguing that the reliance on federal approval undermines the commitment to the park's establishment and jeopardizes jobs in the timber industry. Saunders described the government's approach as a “coward move,” asserting that it puts people's livelihoods at risk without a definitive commitment to the park’s creation.

In contrast, Minns defended the government's position, suggesting that establishing the GKNP could benefit the environment while also providing opportunities for major manufacturing firms to engage in carbon credit trading. As the debate continues, the fate of the Great Koala National Park remains uncertain, caught in the intricate interplay between state commitments and federal approvals.